Left: C. B. M, vol. 22 t. 879 (1805), Right;Botanic Garden, vol. 11, t. 259, fig. 2 (1845-1846) |
日本で,伊藤伊兵衛『廣益地錦抄 巻之七』(1719)に「鉢植にしてながめたへす愛賞すへし」とあるように,その葉と花は美しく,英国では自生しないが,シベリアから移入され,観賞用として栽培された.
1787年に カーチス (William Curtis,
1746 – 1799) によって創刊され,現在でも刊行されている★“Botanical Magazine” は,その正式なタイトルが
“The Botanical Magazine; or, Flower-Garden displayed: in which
the most ornamental foreign plants,
cultivated in the open ground, the green-house, and the stove, are accurately
represented in their natural colours. ” とあるように,英国外から移入され,屋外・無加温室・加温温室で育てられた観賞価値の高い花卉類の図譜である.
この図譜の第二十二巻(1805)の[879]図には,貧弱なシャジクソウの圖が掲げられている(冒頭図,左側).これは,鉢で育てた標本を描いたもので,で一つの花しかついていない一本の莖だが,屋外で育てると,もっと多くの茎が立ち,垂れ下がるほどの花が着く.Kew植物園では 1763 年には栽培されていた.とある.
ベンジャミン・マウンド(Benjamin Maund,1790 – 1863)は,イギリスの薬剤師,植物学者,画家,出版業者であり,1827年には英国リンネ協会のフェローになった.彼が1825年から刊行した ★"The Botanic Garden" (1825 - 1850) は全13巻の定期刊行物で,主に王宮庭園で栽培されていた観賞用の草花を,1ページに4個ずつ掲載し,若き日のビクトリア女王 “To Her Most Gracious Majesty, The Queen: “ に捧げられた.
華麗な植物画は,高名な植物画家のオーガスタ・ウィザース(Augusta Innes
Withers, 1792 – 1877),エドウィン・D・スミス(Edwin D. Smith),プリシラ・スーザン・ビューリー(Priscilla
Susan Bury, 1799 – 1872)やマウンドの娘らが描いたが,画面の小ささもあって,植物学的な正確さの面からは物足りない.
"The Botanic Garden" の正式なタイトルは,”The botanic garden ; consisting of highly finished representations
of hardy ornamental flowering plants,
cultivated in Great Britain ; with their names, classes, orders, history,
qualities, culture, and physiological observations.” で,英国の庭園で育てやすく,観賞価値の高い花卉類を描いたとしている.
この図譜の第十一巻(1845-1846),図. 259, fig. 2 には,白い花をつけるシャジクソウが描かれていて,詳細な説明文がつけられている(冒頭図,右側,赤枠内).
そして,1741年には英国に移入されていたとあり,上記ボタニカルマガジンの移入年より20年程早い.牧草としての可能性にも言及.
[
879 ]
TRIFOLIUXM
LUPINASTER. LUPINE TREFOIL.
Class
and Order.
DIADELPHIA
DECANDRIA.
Generic Character.
Flores subcapitati. Legumen vix
calyce longius, non deciscens,
deciduum.
Specific
Character and Synonyms.
TRIFOLIUM Lupinaster; capitulis dimidiatis, foliis quinatis
sessilibus, leguminibus polyspermis. Sp. Pl.
1079. Willd,
3. p. 1357. Hort. Ups. 223.
TRIFOLIUM leguminibus polyspermis, foliis
pluribus. Gmel.
Sib. 4. p. 19. t. 6.
f. 1.
LUPINASTER. Buxb. in Nov. Comment. Petrop. 2. p. 345.
t. 20. Amm. Ruth. n. 143,
144.
Our drawing, being taken from a specimen
which grew in
a pot, represents the plant of a much
smaller size than usual ;
for when planted in the open ground it
grows to the height of
a foot and a half, and has larger leaves,
is also branched and
bears a number of heads of flowers on
longer peduncles.
The flowers growing from one side of the
flattened end of the
peduncle give the head a cristated
appearance, forming what
LINNÆUS calls capitulum dimidiatum ; but in a more vigorous
growth, the extremity of the peduncle
turning further round,
the head becomes globular, and the above
appearance is confined
to the more early state of the flowering.
In habit this
leaflets being very similar, except that
they appear entirely sessile,
from the membranous stipule running the
whole length of the
peduncle and closely embracing the item. It
is a singular deviation
from the rest of the genus that it bears
for the most
part five, rarely six or seven leaflets
upon one footstalk, nor
can the two lower ones, as sometimes happens
in Lotus, be
well considered as enlarged stipules. The
seed-pods are represented
by BUXBAUM as very long, but in our plant
they are
contained within the decayed remains of the
flower, as described
by AMMAN. Raised from Siberian seeds by Mr.
LODDIGES
of Hackney, but has several times been in
our gardens before;
is said in the Hortus Kewensis to have been
first introduced by
Mr. JAMES GORDON in 1763, and we saw it in
the late Dr.
PITCAIRN'S collection in 1789. It has a
fusiform root and is
but little disposed to produce offsets ;
hence if care is not taken
to preserve the seed, of which very little
will usually ripen with
us, it must be liable to be soon lost. Is
perfectly hardy.
註* TRIFOLIUM rubens: Red feather clover 花はよく似ているが小葉は三枚.
図は Trifolium rubens L. Sturm, J., Sturm, J.W., Deutschlands flora, vol. 4, t. [40] (1803-1804)
図は Trifolium rubens L. Sturm, J., Sturm, J.W., Deutschlands flora, vol. 4, t. [40] (1803-1804)
Maund, B., “The Botanic Garden”, vol. 11, t. 259, fig. 2 (1845-1846)
TRIFOLIUM
LUPINASTER.
LUPINASTER
TREFOIL.
Class.
DIADELPHIA.
Order.
DECANDKIA.
Natural
Order.
LEGUMINOSÆ.
Native of
|
Height.
|
Flowers in
|
Duration.
|
Introduced
|
||
Siberia.
|
2 feet.
|
July, Aug.
|
Perennial.
|
in 1741.
|
||
No.
1034.
Trifolium, a
word descriptive of a three-leaved
plant. The present genus is well suited to
hear
the name, notwithstanding the plant now
published
happens to form a singular exception;
inasmuch
as its leaflets, produced from one
foot-stalk,
vary from three to seven, hut are usually
five. This
peculiarity of foliage, which resembles
that of a Lupine,
obtained for it the specific name
Lupinaster.
This species of
Trifolium is ornamental in the
borders ; and its mode of infloresence—the
flowers
growing from one side of the peduncle,
assists in
distinguishing it from common sorts.
Although a
perennial plant, and completely hardy, it
is not
often met with. This may be accounted for
by its
apparent desire for change of soil, for it
produces
stoloniferous roots, which wander in search
of food,
and if these be not taken off and replanted
occasionally,
they will not continue long insensible to
such disregard ; hence we see, that without
some
attention be given it, like many of even
our commonest
plants, it will pine and leave us. No
friendship can be permanently maintained
without
the observance of kindly attentions.
Mr. Babington, in his Manual of Botany,
enumerates
twenty-one species of Trefoil as indigenous
to Great Britain ; half of these may,
however, be
regarded as botanical curiosities rather
than common
or forage plants. In the science of agriculture
(agriculture well deserves the title of
science)
several Trefoils are esteemed as valuable; particularly
Trifolium pratense, or Red Clover, and
Trifolium
repens, or White Clover. The former of
these is exceedingly valuable, not alone on
account
of its abundant produce, but also on
account of its
restoration of land to a state fitted again
for the
cereal grains, as wheat, &c. But here,
we are sorry
to mention, that the science of agriculture
is yet
exceedingly imperfect. Practice has shown
disappointing
results, but science has not yet (as we
expect it will) explained the remedy.
Clover cannot
be frequently cultivated on the same laud.
The
same may be said of other crops, but their
results
are less striking. The land, as the farmer
says,
tires of it; and the fact is, becomes
incapable of
producing it. Several crops of this Clover,
even at
intervals of two or three years, will so empty
the
soil of the particular sort of food it
requires, that
succeeding crops upon the same land will be
famished.
The usual manures prove unavailing. The
earth's storehouse must again be gradually
replenished
by absorption from rains and the
atmosphere.
Here is a fact—shown by practice, and
hitherto
irreparable. Science, ere long, may be
expected
to supply the remedy, and assist the farmer
in replenishing
his soil, with the same certainty as by
the growth of any crop it is improverished.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿